The speed camera decree was pause. The bureaucratic machine stops on the order of the Ministry of Infrastructure, while the cards remain closed in the drawers of Porta Pia. A Sunday note, dry as a work sign in progress, confirmed that The text has not yet arrived in Brussels. Matteo Salvini has invoked new insights, an additional tour of reflections before the document exceeds the border.
Devices between old and new regime
The heart of the text was simple: all detectors entered service After August 13, 2017 they were considered compliant to the rules. For the older ones, however, a high school exam was foreseen: controls, certifications, technical tests. The producers would have had thirty days to demonstrate the goodness of the devices already installed. Otherwise, the Blackout was taken: tools awaiting new homologations.
Auovelox, a decree born to clean
More than a revolution, the text aimed to put back order in the jungle of sanctions. Local authorities, attracted by easy revenue, had disseminated the roads of devices not always in order. The motorists, for their part, had responded with a river of appeals. The decree tried to close the game: whoever has the requirements can remain on, the others turn off as well. But with the suspension decided by the Ministry, everything returns to the balance. The disputes continue, the judgments accumulate, and the certainty of law remains parked.
The line of consumers and politics
From the association front, the Codacons He adopted a prudent tone. “There will be no avalanche effect on appeals until the decree is implemented,” said Stefano Zerbi. A measured phrase, which photographs the wait for a definitive legislation. Meanwhile, motorists continue to resort, the municipalities to collect and the judges to unravel the umpteenth node of an administrative machine that works in sob.
From the Parliament Francesca Ghirra, deputy of the Verdi and left alliance has arrived: “Minister Fleximan-Salvini perhaps must deal with the reality of the European system”. An arrow that does not need foot notes.
A frozen text between fines and Brussels
The speed camera decree, as anticipated above, was born with an ambition: separating who can fine from who not. The ruleshowever,, they must also please Europe. And here the question becomes complicated. The devices following June 13, 2017 were safe. For others, a complex procedure, with six months to return to the parameters. Otherwise, the deactivation. All this while in the background there are no small economic interests: the municipalities do not want to give up the proceeds, the manufacturers defend their market, citizens ask for transparency.
In the meantime, the devices remain where they are. Some operate with consolidated certifications, others await checks. This is not a generalized gray area, but a situation in which models in order and appliances are coexising pending regularization.
