Gas, the EU and Italy are paying for the cut in supplies from Russia

Europe still continues to import a lot of gas from Russia. Despite the sanctions and new agreements with other producing countries. However, the interruption of Russian supplies decided by some EU states has produced negative effects on the entire economy and industry of the Old Continent.

This is certified by the Bank of Italy, in the report entitled “Natural gas and macroeconomics: not all energy shocks are the same”, in which he argues that the resulting gas market crisis has produced much longer-lasting and negative repercussions than the oil crises. Here’s how and why.

Italy is outside the Chinese Silk Road: the reason for the step backwards and what happens now.

Russian gas and market crisis in the EU

The Bank of Italy’s analysis highlights how “an increase in wholesale oil prices is coming immediately incorporated into the energy price indexwhile a rise in gas prices takes about a year to fully propagate, with a final impact approximately five times greater than the initial one“. Making a historical-economic excursus, the central institute states that “the most severe restrictions on gas supply in Europe have systematically taken place following adverse natural events or political tensions linked to conflicts between Russia and Ukraine”. This is because such restrictions cause “a slowdown in economic activity and a rise in inflation”.

Unlike the oil crisesHowever, those of the gas market reveal their negative effects very gradually, “with a peak in inflation for non-energy goods following the initial shock lasted over two years“. According to data reported by the Bank of Italy, the impact of a gas crisis is double that of a crude oil crisis. Not only that: “The decline in gas supply significantly increases the energy and primary goods prices over longer periods“. And it matters little if in the meantime many European states have taken action by signing supply contracts with third countries.

The reduced availability of gas in Europe from 2022 onwards was therefore a key element at the origin of thesoaring inflation and, consequently, of the destabilization of the European economic system. To talk about the industrial plan. In this context it is the Germany to feel the blow of the sharp cut in Russian energy supplies, which covered 50% of German energy needs. One of the main reasons for the economic and production crisis that Berlin has been dealing with for a while (as we explained here).

Italy is the EU country with the greatest energy dependence

Much of Europe has decided to Don’t import any more Russian gas so as not to provide money that Moscow would use to wage war against Ukraine. Data in hand, however, in the first seven months of 2023 the Old Continent imported 40% more LNG compared to the same period of 2021. A quantity equal to approximately 22 million cubic meterswhich arrived on our shores by ship from Russia between January and July 2023. In the podium of the nations that purchase the most gas from Russia on a global level, two are members of the EU: the first remains the China (20% of the total gas used), while in second place is the Spain (18%) and in third the Belgium (17%).

Overall, Europe is the part of the world with the greater degree of energy dependence (55.5%). According to the fifth Med & Italian Energy Reportthe country most dependent among the countries most dependent on foreign energy supplies is Italy (73.5%). The import of Russian gas into our country was reduced almost tenfold in the space of three years, going from 28.4% in 2020 to 2.4% in the first ten months of 2023. Moscow’s supplies were replaced by those coming fromAlgeria across the Transmed pipelinealmost doubled in the same period: from 12% in 2020 to 20.2% in the first ten months of 2023 (here we explain why the gas bill drops by just 19 euros a year).

From January to July this year, EU member states purchased around 52% of 41.6 million cubic meters of LNG exported in total from Russia: last year the percentage was 49%, while in 2021 it was 39%. According to the calculations of Global Witness, by the end of 2023 the quantity of gas imported will reach a historic record for the European Union, for a total amount of approximately 5.3 billion euros. Total is the largest non-Russian buyer of liquefied gas: almost 4.2 million cubic meters of Russian LNG since the beginning of the year. Global Witness also reported that between March and December 2022, Shell had bought and sold 12% of all Russian supplies, amounting to more than 7.5 million cubic meters of LNG. According to the Kpler analyst Adam Bennettabout 90% of Russian liquefied natural gas flows over the next ten years will end up in Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Spain.

Meanwhile, Qatar is moving

It is not only Algeria and the United States (other large LNG exporters) that are “undermining” the Russian reign of gas in Europe, but also a Gulf country that is acquiring more and more international centrality also due to its role as mediator in the conflict between Israel and Hamas (we also talked about it here): Qatar. After striking a supply deal with France, the small but mighty emirate will also send gas to Shell in the Netherlands for 27 years. Before looking to the Old Continent, Qatar had already become the world’s leading exporter of liquefied natural gas thanks to long-term supplies signed on the Asian market.

The Arab country has implemented a plan that will increase its liquefaction capacity from 77 mtpa to 126 mtpa by 2027. Under this, from 2026 Qatar will be able to send rivers of LNG to Rotterdam, at the rate of approximately 3.5 million tonnes per year. All through deu joint venture between QatarEnergy and Shell as part of the North Field LNG expansion project. And all this even without the clear contrast between the Qatari project and the EU’s declared objective zero emissions by 2050. The agreement, according to the president of QatarEnergy, Saad al-Kaabi, demonstrates the country’s commitment “to meet European energy demand and to strengthen energy security with a source known for its superior economic and environmental qualities.”